Sentencing.
Summary
Existing law provides that most felonies are punishable by a triad of terms of incarceration in the state prison, comprised of low, middle, and upper terms. Previous law that required the court to impose the middle term, unless there were circumstances in aggravation or mitigation of the crime, was amended to provide that the choice of the appropriate term rests within the sound discretion of the court. Existing provisions related to sentence enhancements involving criminal street gang activity, firearms, and sentencing generally specify that the court shall impose the middle term of a triad of sentence enhancements unless there are circumstances in aggravation or mitigation of the crime. This bill would delete the requirement that the court impose the middle term, as specified, from those provisions and instead provide that the court, in its discretion, impose the enhancement that best serves the interests of justice. This bill would provide that these changes would be repealed on January 1, 2011. This bill would amend Proposition 21, an initiative statute adopted by the voters at the March 7, 2000, Statewide Primary Election that provides that its provisions may be amended by the Legislature by a 23 vote of the membership of each house, and therefore requires a 23 vote.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 12, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2009 · Assembly Sep 3, 2009
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
Jun 3, 2009
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
Sep 3, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-3)
Aug 31, 2009
Assembly · Reported by committee
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
Aug 31, 2009
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
Jul 8, 2009
Assembly · Referred to committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
Jun 23, 2009
Assembly · Reported by committee
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
Jun 23, 2009
Assembly · Referred to committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Jun 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
May 28, 2009
Senate · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 1068.)
Apr 16, 2009
Senate · Referred to committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Apr 15, 2009
Senate · Amendment adopted
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 480.)
Feb 12, 2009
Senate · Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roderick Wright
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 150
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 150. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline