Horse racing law intent: backstretch personnel housing: jockey riding fees.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides that the intent of the Horse Racing Law is to allow parimutuel wagering on horse races while, among other things, supporting the network of California fairs. This bill would delete supporting the network of California fairs from that statement of intent. (2) Existing law provides that the California Horse Racing Board shall adopt emergency regulations to establish standards governing the employee housing provided to backstretch personnel at licensed racetracks, as specified. No license shall be issued to a racing association to conduct a horse race meeting unless the board has inspected the housing conditions that exist on the racetrack's backstretch and determined the living conditions to be in compliance with the standards established by the board. This bill would delete any reference to the emergency regulations in these provisions, for which compliance was mandated by January 1, 2004, rendering the language obsolete. (3) Existing law provides various findings of the Legislature in regards to professional jockey fees, including that the riding fee should be increased at least as much on a percentage basis as the state minimum wage, so that the average full-time jockey can earn an income sufficient to provide for the basic necessities of life. Existing law provides that minimum jockey riding fees for losing mounts and minimum amounts awarded to 2nd and 3rd place finishers be increased by a specified amount as of January 1, 2008, and by additional amounts on later dates, as specified. This bill would delete obsolete language from those provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Apr 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Aug 2010
Introduced Mar 8, 2010
Signed Aug 13, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Apr 29, 2010 · Assembly Aug 2, 2010
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 38
Apr 29, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Aug 13, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 2, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-1)
assembly
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30).
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-5)
senate
Apr 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be placed on Consent Calendar.
upper
Apr 14, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3182.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 8, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1486
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1486. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline