Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: operating permits.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act is administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Existing law requires the director of the department to make an annual report to the Legislature on the department's activities, which includes recommendations for legislation to improve the department's abilities to administer the act. This bill would revise the report requirements to no longer include legislative recommendations. (2) The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides for the issuance of licenses for which various annual fees are charged depending upon the type of license issued. Existing law authorizes the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to annually adjust the fees charged commencing with the 2010 calendar year by an amount not to exceed an inflation factor based on the Consumer Price Index. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to reflect existing law. (3) Existing provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, known as "tied-house" restrictions, generally prohibit a winegrower from having an ownership interest in an on-sale alcoholic beverage license, with limited exceptions. Among other exemptions, existing law exempts from the tied-house restrictions any licensed winegrower who meets specified conditions and any on-sale licensee that holds any ownership or interest in a winegrower, including that the winegrower or on-sale licensee, or his or her officer, director, or agent, enters into an undertaking, approved by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, that makes specified statements regarding the sale or furnishing of wine by the winegrower, or any officer, director, or agent of the winegrower. This bill would retain the requirement that the winegrower or on-sale licensee, or officer, director, or agent meet the specified conditions regarding the sale or furnishing of wine under the circumstances described above, but would eliminate the requirement that statements describing these conditions be made pursuant to an undertaking approved by the department. (4) Existing law authorizes the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, in its discretion, to issue an interim retail permit to an applicant for any retail license to operate the premises during the period an application for a license at the premises is pending, subject to specified conditions. This bill would revise the authorization of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to, in its discretion, issue an interim operating permit to an applicant for any license to operate the premises during the period an application for a license at the premises is pending, subject to specified conditions applicable to all licensees or retail licensees only. (5) The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that a violation of any of its provisions for which another penalty or punishment is not specifically provided is a misdemeanor. This bill would expand existing crimes by imposing additional duties on a licensee under the act, thus, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Apr 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Mar 8, 2010
Signed Sep 24, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2010 · Assembly Aug 12, 2010
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 38
Aug 19, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Sep 23, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-3)
senate
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4653.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 12, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-1)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be placed on Consent Calendar.
upper
Apr 14, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3182.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 8, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1480
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1480. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline