Mammogram machines: inspection: posting of results.
Summary
Existing law, commonly known as the Radiation Protection Act of 1988, sets forth the duties of various agencies relating to the protection of the public health and safety from the harmful effects of radiation, including, among others, the duties of the State Department of Public Health regarding the licensing and regulation of radiologic technology, including, but not limited to, the inspection of mammographic X-ray equipment. Violation of provisions relating to radiologic technology is a misdemeanor. This bill would require a facility that operates a mammogram machine to post notices of serious violations, as defined, in an area that is visible to patients. The bill would require the facility to post the notice within 2 working days after receipt of the documents from the department and require that the documents remain posted for a minimum of 5 working days or until action correcting the violation has been completed, whichever is later. Because this bill would create a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 12, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2009 · Assembly Aug 27, 2009
How they voted
34–2
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Jun 1, 2009
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican15
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
9
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 4, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 33. Noes 3. Page 2218.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 27, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-5)
assembly
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-2-3)
senate
May 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Apr 14, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1. Page 420.)
upper
Feb 12, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JO
Jenny Oropeza
DDemocratic
Co
DF
Dean Florez
DDemocratic
Co
EA
Elaine Alquist
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 148
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 148. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline