Outdoor advertising.
Summary
The Outdoor Advertising Act regulates placement of advertising displays adjacent to and within specified distances of highways that are part of the national system of interstate and defense highways and federal-aid highways. The act provides that lawfully erected advertising displays include displays that were erected in compliance with state laws and local ordinances in effect at the time of their erection or displays that were subsequently brought into full compliance with state laws and local ordinances. The act provides that an advertising display whose use is modified after erection in a manner that causes it to become illegal is not a lawfully erected display. The act requires compensation to be paid to the owner of a lawfully erected advertising display if the display is compelled to be removed or its customary maintenance or use is limited, except as specified. This bill would additionally provide that an advertising display whose height, orientation, size, or technology is modified after erection in a manner that causes it to become illegal is not a lawfully erected display. The bill would provide that a lawfully erected advertising display includes displays erected and maintained in compliance with state laws, local ordinances, and local building permit requirements in effect at the time of their erection and displays that were subsequently brought into, and maintained in, full compliance with state laws, local ordinances, and local building permit requirements. The bill would authorize a civil action for disgorgement of specified revenues against the owner, and any person working in concert with the owner, of a display that is not lawfully erected or that is in violation of any state law, local ordinance, or local building permit requirement. The bill would also make an owner of those displays liable for a civil penalty up to $2,500 for each day the violation continues and would require the court to consider specified factors in assessing the amount of the civil penalty. The bill would require moneys collected pursuant to these provisions to be paid to the General Fund or to the treasurer of the city or county where a judgment is entered and to the General Fund, as specified.
Bill status
died
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
May 2010
Senate Failed
Jun 2010
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2010
How they voted
14–20
Failed · 4 other
Total votes 38
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic25
56% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Jun 3, 2010
Vote failed
Senate Vote: fail (14-20-4)
senate
May 24, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 28, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 3306.)
upper
Apr 15, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 3211.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on T. & H. and JUD.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1470
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1470. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline