Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: California Water Plan: water quality.
Summary
Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board as a state agency with authority to administer the water resources of the state. Existing law authorizes the board to investigate all streams, stream systems, lakes, or other bodies of water, take testimony relating to the rights to water or the use of water, and ascertain whether water filed upon or attempted to be appropriated is appropriated under the laws of the state. Existing law requires the board to take appropriate actions to prevent waste or the unreasonable use of water. This bill would require the board, by January 1, 2012, to identify all parties, including public and private parties, that benefit from waters originating in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta watershed and whose activities impact the Delta watershed. The bill would also require the board, by that date, to develop a process for determining the degree of responsibility attributable to each of the identified parties for physical and environmental impacts on the Delta. Under existing law, the Department of Water Resources is required to update a coordinated plan for the conservation, development, and utilization of state water resources known as the California Water Plan, on or before December 31, 2003, and every 5 years thereafter, and to include in the plan update a discussion of various strategies, including, but not limited to, those relating to the development of new water storage facilities, water conservation, water recycling, desalination, conjunctive use, and water transfers that may be pursued in order to meet the future water needs of the state. This bill would require the department, as a part of its update of the California Water Plan, commencing with the update that is due on or before December 31, 2013, and every 5 years thereafter, to identify the infrastructure needs for the state, by hydrologic region, over the next 30 years, estimate the expected costs of associated environmental mitigation and restoration projects over the next 30 years, propose a policy for assigning funding responsibilities to beneficiaries of water resources investments and a financing strategy for funding responsibilities proposed to be assigned to the state, and identify certain related information.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
1
May 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 14, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 3164.)
upper
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Mar 24, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joseph Simitian
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1469
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1469. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline