Recycling: plastic products.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a person from selling a plastic bag or a plastic food or beverage container that is labeled as "compostable" or "marine degradable" unless that plastic bag or container meets certain American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard specifications or a standard adopted by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Existing law prohibits the sale of a plastic bag or plastic food or beverage container that is labeled as "biodegradable," "degradable," "decomposable," or as otherwise specified. Existing law provides for the imposition of a civil penalty for a violation of these prohibitions. This bill would repeal those prohibitions and would instead prohibit the sale of a plastic product, as defined, labeled as "compostable" or "marine degradable" unless it meets those ASTM standard specifications or a standard adopted by the department, or unless the plastic product is labeled with a qualified claim for which the department has adopted an existing standard, and the plastic product meets that standard. The bill would prohibit the sale of a plastic product that is labeled as "biodegradable," "degradable," "decomposable," or as otherwise specified. The bill would provide for the imposition of a civil penalty for a violation of those prohibitions. The bill would state legislative findings and declarations regarding plastic litter.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 28, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
25–8
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Jun 2, 2010
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican12
50% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 28, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 24. Noes 7. Page 4903.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-25-5)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 21.)
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 2, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-8-4)
senate
May 11, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 3499.)
upper
Apr 26, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3301.)
upper
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1454
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1454. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline