Parole: electronic monitoring.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to release a prisoner on a specified period of parole after the expiration of a specified term of imprisonment. Under existing law, the department is authorized to return a parolee to prison if the Board of Parole Hearings determines that the parolee violated the terms of his or her parole, as specified. Existing law prohibits the department from returning certain parolees to prison, placing a parole hold on the parolee, or reporting the parolee to the Board of Parole Hearings for a violation of parole, as specified. This bill would provide that a parolee to whom these limitations on the department are applicable may be required to wear an electronic monitoring device, for the duration of the parole period, by a local law enforcement agency that has primary jurisdiction over the location where the parolee resides and has been authorized by the department, in its discretion, to use global positioning system technology or otherwise monitor nonrevocable parolees. This bill would provide that any local law enforcement agency meeting those conditions shall, prior to any electronic monitoring of nonrevocable parolees, enter into a memorandum of understanding with the department, as specified, at the agency's expense. The bill would provide that the cost of acquiring, leasing, and monitoring an electronic monitoring device shall be the responsibility of the local law enforcement agency requiring the wearing of the device.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 13, 2010
How they voted
27–0
Passed · 11 other
Total votes 38
May 13, 2010
D
Democratic25
64% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Amendments
2
Nov 30, 2010
Assembly · Failed
From Assembly without further action.
Nov 30, 2010
Assembly · Failed
From committee without further action.
Jun 29, 2010
Assembly · Failed in committee
Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
May 13, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-0-11)
May 11, 2010
Senate · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3499.)
May 4, 2010
Senate · Amendment adopted
(May 4 amended version corrected May 6.)
Apr 26, 2010
Senate · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
Apr 21, 2010
Senate · Amendment adopted
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3166.)
Feb 19, 2010
Senate · Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
GR
George Runner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1452
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1452. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline