Juveniles: secure detention facilities.
Summary
Existing law requires the annual inspection of any jail, juvenile hall, or special purpose juvenile hall that, in the preceding calendar year, was used for confinement, for more than 24 hours, of any minor. Existing law requires the Corrections Standards Authority to establish minimum standards for state and local correctional facilities. The federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002 provides grants to the states to support state and local programs that address juvenile delinquency, as specified. The act requires that a state submit a state plan that meets specified criteria in order to be eligible for those grants. Among other criteria, the state plan must provide that certain juveniles will not be placed in secure detention facilities, must ensure that juveniles will not be detained or confined in any institution in which they have contact with adult inmates, and must provide for an adequate system of monitoring jails, detention facilities, correctional facilities, and nonsecure facilities to ensure that these and other criteria set forth in the act are met. The act also requires annual reporting of the results of that monitoring, except as specified. This bill would require the Corrections Standards Authority to inspect and collect relevant data from any facility that may be used for the secure detention of minors, in accordance with the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Apr 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Aug 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Aug 18, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly Aug 5, 2010
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 39
Apr 22, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
64% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Aug 18, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 5, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-7)
assembly
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30).
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-7)
senate
Apr 19, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3003.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Alex Padilla
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1447
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1447. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline