Public retirement: final compensation: computation: retirees.
Summary
(1) The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) creates the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) , which provides a defined benefit to its members based on age at retirement, service credit, and final compensation. PERL defines "final compensation" for purposes of calculating a member's retirement allowance. The State Teachers' Retirement Law (STRL) and the retirement laws for county employees and city employees also provide for a defined benefit based on age at retirement, service credit, and final compensation. This bill would provide that any change in salary, compensation, or remuneration principally for the purpose of enhancing a member's benefits would not be included in the calculation of a member's final compensation for purposes of determining that member's defined benefit. The bill would generally require the board of each state and local public retirement system to establish, by regulation, accountability provisions that would include an ongoing audit process to ensure that a change in a member's salary, compensation, or remuneration is not made principally for the purpose of enhancing a member's retirement benefits. This bill would revise the definition of "creditable compensation" and would limit the calculation of a member's final compensation to an amount not to exceed the average increase in compensation received within the final compensation period and the 2 preceding years by employees in the same or a related group as that member. This bill would also provide that a person who retires on or after January 1, 2012, may not perform services for any employer covered by a state or local retirement system until that person has been separated from service for a period of at least 180 days. This bill would provide for the implementation of these required changes under the laws that govern PERS and STRL. (2) The Defined Benefit Supplement Program under STRL provides supplemental retirement, disability, final, and termination benefits, payable either in a lump-sum payment or as an annuity, to members receiving benefits under the Defined Benefit Program of the State Teachers' Retirement Plan. This bill would provide that member and employer contributions credited to the Defined Benefit Supplemental Program would include remuneration earnable within a 5-year period in excess of 125% of that member's compensation earnable in the year prior to that 5-year period. This bill would provide, in the case of a member who retires on or after January 1, 2012, and who elects to receive his or her retirement benefit under the Defined Benefit Supplemental Program as a lump-sum payment, that the lump-sum payment would not be payable until 180 days have elapsed following the effective date of the member's retirement. (3) This bill includes Legislative findings expressing the public purpose that would be served by the enactment of this bill. This bill would, except as otherwise specified, provide that its provisions would become operative on July 1, 2011. This bill would further provide that it would only become operative if AB 1987 of the 2009–10 Regular Session is also enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2011.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2010 · Assembly Aug 30, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 34
Jun 1, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 5069.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0)
assembly
Aug 16, 2010
Lower · Passed
(August 16 amended measure version corrected August 18.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee August 12.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 1, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-3)
senate
May 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3675.)
upper
Apr 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 13, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3164.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joseph Simitian
DDemocratic
Co
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Co
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Co
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1425
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1425. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline