Corporations for prevention of cruelty to animals.

Existing law authorizes corporations for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals, or both, to be formed under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law and requires the articles of incorporation for those corporations to be endorsed, as evidence of necessity, by the Department of Justice or by a judge of the superior court of the county in which the society's principal office is located, as specified. This bill would eliminate the authority to form these corporations for the prevention of cruelty to children and eliminate the requirement of endorsement of the articles of incorporation. Existing law requires a city or county, or city and county, to pay up to $500 per month to a society actively engaged in enforcing state laws for the prevention of cruelty to animals or children. This bill would instead authorize local governments to enter into contracts with societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals for the enforcement of these laws and would also permit these societies to enforce these laws without a contract. Existing law requires a humane society or society for the prevention of cruelty to animals that proposes to appoint a humane officer to submit an application for appointment to a judge of the superior court for the county in which the society is located, including a copy of the resolution appointing the person, and documentation that the person has satisfactorily completed required training, as specified. Upon receipt of a report from the Department of Justice of the record, if any, of the proposed appointee, existing law requires the judge to review the appointee's qualifications and fitness to act as a humane officer, and either confirm or deny the appointment. This bill would require a society, prior to filing a Petition for Order Confirming Appointment of a Humane Officer, to submit to the Department of Justice fingerprint images and information regarding applicants in order to obtain state criminal record information, as specified, and to request subsequent arrest notification and would allow the Department of Justice to charge a reasonable fee to cover related costs. The bill would also require a society to include with its Petition for Order Confirming Appointment of a Humane Officer, a copy of the resolution making the appointment, a copy of criminal record offender information, proof of the society's proper incorporation and required liability insurance, as specified, and, if the society has not previously appointed a humane officer, an affidavit that demonstrates the society's competence to appoint a humane officer by providing specified information. The bill would require a society seeking confirmation of an appointment of a humane officer to serve a copy of the petition on the Department of the California Highway Patrol, the Department of Justice, the State Humane Association of California, and the police department and sheriff's department having jurisdiction where the society's principal office is located. The bill would also authorize those parties to file opposition to the petition and for the filer to reply, as specified. The bill would also require the court, in determining whether to confirm the appointment, to consider any documentation submitted in support of, or opposition to, the proposed appointment. The bill would require the court to deny certification of the appointment if the society was incorporated on or after January 1, 2011, and certain criteria are not met. The bill would authorize the Department of Justice to charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs of maintaining records of orders confirming appointment. Existing law provides that all appointments of humane officers expire 3 years from the date the court order is submitted to the county clerk. This bill would eliminate that provision. Under existing law, a local law enforcement agency or the State Humane Association of California may petition for a revocation hearing regarding a humane officer's appointment. This bill would also require a party petitioning for a revocation to serve copies of specified documents on each of the parties required to receive copies of a Petition for Order Confirming Appointment of a Humane Officer, as specified. Existing law prescribes the powers and qualifications of level 1 and level 2 humane officers. Level 1 humane officers are authorized to carry firearms, subject to specified requirements. Existing law requires humane officers to complete specified continuing education every 3 years. This bill would impose additional specified training requirements for level 1 and level 2 humane officers. The bill would require a humane officer to certify to the Department of Justice compliance with the continuing education and training requirements and would provide that failure to comply shall result in revocation of the appointment. The bill would also specify additional requirements for the initial and continued use of firearms. The bill would also require a society to possess liability insurance of at least $1,000,000. The bill would authorize the Department of Justice to charge a reasonable fee to maintain records of certificates of compliance. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to maintain state summary criminal history information, as defined, and to provide that information to persons holding specified occupations including, without limitation, probation officers and parole officers. Existing law requires local criminal justice agencies to maintain similar information and provide that information to specified agencies and persons holding specified occupations. This bill would add humane officers to the specified persons to whom the Department of Justice and local criminal justice agencies are required to provide the criminal history information. The bill would authorize a local agency to impose a fee to cover the reasonable costs of providing that information. By expanding the duties of local criminal justice agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.