Medicine: licensure examinations.
Summary
Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, requires the Medical Board of California to issue a physician's and surgeon's certificate to a qualified applicant. Under the act, an applicant for a physician's and surgeon's certificate is required to include specified information with his or her application and to obtain a passing score on an entire examination or on each part of an examination. Existing law authorizes applicants to take the written examinations conducted or accepted by the board in separate parts, and requires the board to adopt by resolution the passing score for each examination or each part of an examination. Existing law requires an applicant to obtain a passing score on Step III of the United States Medical Licensing Examination within not more than 4 attempts of taking that part of the examination. This bill would delete the prohibition on taking Step III of the United States Medical Licensing Examination more than 4 times. The bill would also require the board to accept as a passing score from an applicant the passing score that was adopted by the board and in effect on the date the applicant registered for that examination or part of the examination. The bill would further require the board to act by passing a resolution every time it adopts a passing score for an entire examination or for each part of an examination that is required for certification, subject to specified requirements and in conformity with the court's holding in Marquez v. Medical Board of California (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 548.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2010 · Assembly Aug 19, 2010
How they voted
27–0
Passed · 10 other
Total votes 37
May 28, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican12
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4890.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 28, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-0-10)
senate
Apr 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3069.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
GC
Gilbert Cedillo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1410
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1410. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline