Electronic control weapons.
Summary
Existing law regulates the use and possession of less lethal weapons and stun guns, which are defined to include weapons able or intended to stun or immobilize a person, like the electrical weapons commonly known as tasers. This bill would codify the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Bryan v. McPherson (2009) 590 F.3d 767, relating to the use of tasers by law enforcement, would make findings and declarations about electronic control weapons, and would encourage law enforcement agencies to establish use of force policies regarding those weapons, as specified. The bill would provide that an electronic control weapon, as defined, may only be used when objectively reasonable and compatible with specified constitutional provisions and may not be used in the absence of a threat of imminent physical harm to the officer or to others.
Bill status
died
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Apr 2010
Senate Failed
Jun 2010
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2010
How they voted
20–16
Failed · 2 other
Total votes 38
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Jun 3, 2010
Vote failed
Senate Vote: fail (20-16-2)
senate
Apr 20, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 3310.)
upper
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1347
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1347. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline