Pupils: teen dating violence prevention.
Summary
Existing law requires a school district that provides instruction to pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, to provide an adopted course of study to those pupils, as specified. Existing law requires the State Board of Education to adopt content standards in certain curriculum areas. This bill would authorize a school district to provide teen dating violence prevention education consisting of age-appropriate instruction, as developed by the state board pursuant to the bill, as part of the sexual health and health education program it provides to pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive. The bill would authorize a school district to use school district personnel or outside consultants who are trained in the appropriate courses to provide this additional instruction. The bill would specify the required content and criteria for this additional instruction and any associated materials if a school district elects to provide it. The bill would provide that a parent or guardian of a pupil has the right to excuse his or her child from all or part of the teen dating violence prevention education and any assessments related to it, and would prescribe the procedure for a parent or guardian to exercise that right. The bill would require the state board to incorporate teen dating violence and sexual violence curriculum into the health curriculum framework at its next revision, as specified.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2010
How they voted
22–8
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 38
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican13
53% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
2
Committee
2
Amendments
1
Jun 30, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee.
lower
Jun 3, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-8-8)
senate
May 28, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3674.)
upper
Apr 22, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 3295.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1300
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1300. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline