Regional occupational centers and programs.
Summary
Existing law establishes various categorical education programs, including regional occupational centers and programs, and appropriates the funding for those programs in the annual Budget Act. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2008–09 to 2012–13 fiscal years, inclusive, to apportion from the amount provided in the annual Budget Act for specified categorical education programs an amount based on the same relative proportion that the local educational agency received in the 2008–09 fiscal year for those programs and authorizes school districts, for those fiscal years, to use these funds, with specified exceptions, for any educational purpose, to the extent permitted by federal law. Existing law, for those fiscal years, deems local educational agencies that use these categorical education program funds for any educational purpose to be in compliance with the program and funding requirements of those categorical education programs. This bill, for the 2011–12 fiscal year, would restrict the authority of a school district to withdraw from a regional occupational center or program if the county board of education or the State Board of Education determines that doing so would negatively impact the career technical education services received by high school pupils of other school districts or charter schools in the region. The bill would require a recipient of funds allocated for career technical education services to expend those funds in accordance with the regional plan for occupational course sequences, in order to meet documented labor market demand, and focus on the needs of high school pupils. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations regarding career technical education programs organized and implemented as occupational course sequences.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2010
How they voted
28–3
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 38
May 27, 2010
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican13
61% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.)
lower
May 27, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-3-7)
senate
May 4, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3428.)
upper
Apr 21, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 20, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 3183.)
upper
Mar 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1298
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1298. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline