Political Reform Act of 1974: conflict of interest codes.
Summary
The Political Reform Act of 1974 requires each state and local government agency to adopt and promulgate a conflict of interest code that establishes conflict of interest standards for designated employees of that agency and requires those employees to file statements of economic interest disclosing specified personal financial information. The act further requires specified public officials, including officials who manage public investments, to also file statements of economic interest, but does not require those officials to be specifically enumerated in the agency's conflict of interest code. This bill would require a board, commission, or agency of a public pension or retirement system to attach to its conflict of interest code an appendix that lists each position for which an individual occupying that position is required to file a statement of economic interests as a public official who manages public investments, as defined. The bill would further require the board, commission, or agency to post the appendix on its Internet Web site. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating additional responsibilities for local governmental agencies. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 26, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 26, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 26, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4922.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-2)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 4, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3427.)
upper
Apr 21, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3297.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 24, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
GR
Gloria Romero
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1271
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1271. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline