Taxation: military housing.
Summary
(1) Existing property tax law requires that all property subject to tax be assessed at its full value, and includes certain possessory interests among those property interests that are subject to tax. Existing property tax law defines a taxable possessory interest to be a use that is independent, durable, and exclusive. Existing property tax law specifies that, for purposes of the definition of a taxable possessory interest, a possession or use is not independent if it is pursuant to a contract that includes, but is not limited to, a long-term lease for the private construction, renovation, rehabilitation, replacement, management, or maintenance of housing for active duty military personnel and their dependents, if the housing units and the private contractor constructing the housing meet specified criteria. This bill would specify that a possession or use is not independent if, under a contract described above, the housing is for active duty military personnel or their dependents, or both, and would provide that the definition of a taxable possessory interest does not apply to a military housing unit managed by a private contractor, under a contract described above, that is rented to a tenant who is an unaffiliated member of the general public, as defined, and would require the private contractor to be responsible for any property taxes on housing units rented to unaffiliated members of the general public.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2010 · Assembly Aug 18, 2010
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 37
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican12
66% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
7
Committee
4
Amendments
2
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4946.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 18, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-5)
assembly
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 28.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 3, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-5)
senate
Jun 1, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3674.)
upper
Apr 15, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3186.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 24, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Denise Moreno Ducheny
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1250
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1250. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline