Local health care districts: operation of facility by another entity.
Summary
Existing law, the Local Health Care District Law, provides for the formation of local health care districts and, until January 1, 2011, authorizes each local district to transfer, at fair market value, any part of its assets to one or more corporations to operate and maintain the assets. Commencing January 1, 2011, existing law, instead, restricts these transfers only to nonprofit corporations. This bill would, notwithstanding any provision of law, require, with certain exceptions, when a district is under contract with a public or private entity to operate a district facility, the district and the public or private entity that operates the district facility to (1) require that assets of any facility within the geographic boundaries of the district and owned by the district be used exclusively for the benefit of a facility owned by the district, except as specified, (2) require the hospital and the operating entity to annually undergo an independent financial audit and that the resulting report be made public, and (3) preclude, in the case of a subsequent sale of the facility or any assets of the district to the operating entity, any losses incurred by the entity in the operation of the facility from being used as a credit against the purchase price of the facility or other district assets. Existing law permits a health care district board of directors to provide for the operation and maintenance through tenants of the whole or any part of a hospital acquired or constructed by it, and for that purpose may enter into a lease agreement that it believes will best serve the interest of the district. This bill would, instead, permit those lease agreements only to the extent that the agreement does not provide benefits to the tenants beyond those reasonably necessary to ensure the operation of the hospital for the benefit of the district and allow the tenant to recoup its capital investments made during the lease agreement. By requiring that districts comply with these requirements, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 32126 of the Health and Safety Code, proposed by S.B. 894, to be operative only if S.B. 894 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2010 · Assembly Aug 31, 2010
How they voted
20–10
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 34
Jun 1, 2010
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-23-2)
assembly
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 13. Page 5101.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 1, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-10-4)
senate
May 24, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 28, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3303.)
upper
Apr 13, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Apr 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3103.)
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ellen Corbett
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1240
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1240. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline