Vehicles: emergency vehicles: fire apparatus.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires specified authorized emergency vehicles owned and operated by a governmental agency that are first purchased on or after January 1, 1994, to meet certain size, weight, and load requirements, including the requirement that the manufacturer weigh and certify fire apparatus to determine compliance with weight requirements. Existing law defines a "fire apparatus" as, among other things, a vehicle designed, maintained, and used exclusively for the suppression of fires or for fire prevention activities, including the training of firefighters. This bill would instead define a "fire apparatus" as a vehicle designed, maintained, and used under emergency conditions to transport personnel and equipment, or for the suppression of fires or mitigation of other hazardous situations, consistent with the 2009 edition of Standard 1901 of the National Fire Protection Association. Existing law, beginning July 2, 2010, authorizes overweight firetrucks with tandem or tridem axles to receive transportation permits from various public entities to operate on public roads but requires the permit to limit tandem and tridem weights to no more than 15% over the weight allowed by law. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would specify that, notwithstanding the weight exemption provided for under existing law, a fire apparatus vehicle is prohibited from towing or hauling any other vehicle or equipment while operating under an overweight permit. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 10, 2010 · Assembly Aug 12, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 38
May 10, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4650.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 12, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-1)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
Jun 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 21)
lower
Jun 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.)
lower
May 10, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-7)
senate
May 5, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3445.)
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1220
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1220. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline