Land use: general plan: safety element: fire hazard impacts.
Summary
(1) The Planning and Zoning Law requires the legislative body of a city or county to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan that includes various elements, including, among others, a safety element for the protection of the community from unreasonable risks associated with, among other things, wildland and urban fires. The safety element includes requirements for state responsibility areas, as defined, and very high fire hazard severity zones, as defined. This bill would revise the safety element requirements for state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones, as specified, and require the safety element, prior to January 1, 2015, and thereafter upon each revision of the housing element, to be reviewed and updated as necessary to address the risk of fire in state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones, taking into account specified considerations, including, among others, the most recent version of the Office of Planning and Research's "Fire Hazard Planning" document, which this bill would require the office to update on or before January 1, 2012. By imposing new duties on a city or county with regard to reviewing and updating its general plan, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA requires the Office of Planning and Research to prepare and develop guidelines for the implementation of CEQA by public agencies. This bill would require the office, on or after January 1, 2011, at the time of the next update of the guidelines for implementing CEQA, in cooperation with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, to prepare, develop, and transmit to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency recommended proposed changes or amendments to the initial study for the inclusion of questions related to fire hazard impacts for projects in state responsibility areas and high fire hazard severity zones. This bill would also require the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to certify and adopt these recommended proposed changes or amendments. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Vetoed Sep 28, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2010 · Assembly Aug 25, 2010
How they voted
22–11
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Jun 1, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 28, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 28, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 26, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 13. Page 4926.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-18-2)
assembly
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee August 12.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 28.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 1, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-11-4)
senate
May 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3673.)
upper
Apr 20, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3300.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 7, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on EQ. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3103.) Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CK
Christine Kehoe
DDemocratic
Co
HD
Hector De La Torre
DDemocratic
Co
MD
Mike Davis
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1207
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1207. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline