Water.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards (regional boards) as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a specified decision or order issued by the state board to obtain review of the order in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after service of a copy of the state board's decision or order. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a final decision or order of a regional board for which the state board denies review to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after the date on which the state board denies review. This bill would provide that an aggrieved party must file a petition for reconsideration with the state board to exhaust that party's administrative remedies only if the initial decision or order is issued under authority delegated to an officer or employee of the state board and the state board by regulation has authorized a petition for reconsideration. The bill, with respect to a decision or order of a regional board, would specify that the authorization to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board applies to a final decision or order of a regional board subject to review under a certain provision of law. (2) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prescribes various timelines for commencing an action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul acts or decisions of a public agency on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA. This bill would provide that the time for filing an action or proceeding subject to these timelines for a person who seeks review of the regional board's decision or order under a specified provision of law, or who seeks reconsideration under a state board regulation authorizing a petition for reconsideration, shall commence upon the state board's completion of that review or reconsideration. (3) Under existing law, each California regional water quality control board consists of 9 members who are appointed by the Governor and who serve 4-year terms. This bill would extend the terms of 2 board members on each regional water quality control board, as specified, to September 30, 2014. (4) Existing law requires that, prior to the indoor use of recycled water in a condominium project, the agency delivering the recycled water to the condominium project file a report with the regional board and receive written approval of the report from the State Department of Public Health. This bill instead would require the agency to file the report with the State Department of Public Health. (5) This bill would update cross-references in, and delete obsolete provisions of, the Water Code, and make various other technical or clarifying changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Signed Sep 24, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
24–10
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
Jun 1, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
39
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 23, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 5004.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 4985.)
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4858.) Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-1-2)
assembly
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30).
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jun 16, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 16, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 1, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-10-3)
senate
May 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3672.)
upper
Apr 26, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3210.)
upper
Mar 11, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1169
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1169. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline