Personal information: privacy.
Summary
Existing law requires any agency, and any person or business conducting business in California, that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information, as defined, to disclose in specified ways, any breach of the security of the system or data, as defined, following discovery or notification of the security breach, to any California resident whose unencrypted personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person. This bill would require any agency, person, or business that is required to issue a security breach notification pursuant to existing law to fulfill certain additional requirements pertaining to the security breach notification, as specified. The bill would also require any agency, person, or business that is required to issue a security breach notification to more than 500 California residents pursuant to existing law to electronically submit a single sample copy of that security breach notification to the Attorney General, as specified. This bill would provide that a covered entity under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act is deemed to have complied with these provisions, if it has complied with existing federal law, as specified. The bill would also incorporate additional changes made by the Governor's Reorganization Plan.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Apr 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly Aug 16, 2010
How they voted
27–5
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Apr 15, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 31. Noes 4. Page 4647.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-22-3)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.)
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-5-3)
senate
Apr 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3001.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joseph Simitian
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1166
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1166. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline