Education: Healthy Schools Act of 2010.
Summary
(1) Existing law generally regulates pesticide use and requires the Department of Pesticide Regulation to promote and facilitate the voluntary adoption of integrated pest management by school districts. Existing law requires every person who sells a pesticide product for use in this state that has been registered by the Director of Pesticide Regulation to pay an assessment at a specified rate. This bill, commencing January 1, 2014, would require all schoolsites, as defined, to adopt an integrated pest management program as established, administered, and enforced by the department. This bill would also require, beginning January 1, 2012, that the rate of the assessment on registered pesticide products be augmented to reimburse the department, local agencies, and school districts for the cost of adopting integrated pest management programs at schoolsites. Because the bill would impose new duties on school districts, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Vetoed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
21–12
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Jun 2, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
44
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Sep 27, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 25, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 26, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 4922.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-25-4)
assembly
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee August 12.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.)
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 2, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-12-4)
senate
May 28, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3672.)
upper
Apr 28, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3301.)
upper
Apr 15, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Apr 14, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 3183.) Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1157
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1157. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline