Gambling Control Act.
Summary
(1) The Gambling Control Act provides for the licensure of certain individuals and establishments involved in various gambling activities, and for the regulation of those activities, by the California Gambling Control Commission. Existing law provides for the enforcement of those activities by the Department of Justice. Existing law permits the commission to adopt regulations related to the operation of a gambling establishment, as provided. This bill would provide that jackpot funds, to which players have made contributions, are held for the benefit of the players and are not the property of the gambling establishment. (2) Existing law requires the department to approve the play of any controlled game, including, but not limited to, placing restrictions and limitations on how a controlled game is played. This bill would provide that a gambling establishment that conducts play of a controlled game that has been approved by the department, but is later found to be unlawful, has an absolute defense to any criminal, administrative, or civil action, so long as the game was being played in the manner approved and during the time for which it was approved.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
29–2
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 34
Jun 2, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican11
72% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 31. Noes 2. Page 4911.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (51-0-9)
assembly
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee August 12.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 2, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-2-3)
senate
May 4, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3427.)
upper
Apr 20, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 19, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3180.)
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DF
Dean Florez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1125
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1125. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline