Land conservation: California Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Act: County of San Bernardino.
Summary
The California Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Act, an initiative measure approved by the voters in the June 7, 1988, statewide primary election, provided bond funds for wildlife, coastal, and parkland conservation. The initiative measure may be amended by a 23 vote of the Legislature if the amendment is consistent with the purposes of the act. Existing law requires an applicant receiving state funds under the act to maintain any property acquired in perpetuity, as specified, and use the property only for the purposes stated in the act and to make no other use, sale, or other disposition of the property except as authorized by a specific act of the Legislature. Existing law requires the County of San Bernardino to sell property it owns within the Chino Agricultural Preserve that was purchased with the bond funds if the county meets certain conditions. This bill would revise and recast that law to authorize the County of San Bernardino to sell or exchange property it owns within the Chino Agricultural Preserve that was purchased with grant funds provided pursuant to the act if the county, among other things, preserves all lands and conservation easements, acquired or dedicated, in perpetuity for agricultural preservation, as specified, or for open-space conservation purposes. The bill would prohibit the county from selling, exchanging, or otherwise acquiring replacement land or conservation easements unless and until the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Bernardino adopts a detailed land plan by December 31, 2011. The bill would require the land plan to meet certain conditions including that it identify each parcel of property acquired with grant funds and show which parcel will be sold, exchanged, purchased, or retained. This bill would also require the county to take certain steps to implement an adopted land plan, including recording a conservation easement for the purpose of agricultural preservation, as specified, or open-space conservation on each property identified for retention by April 1, 2012. The bill would also require the county to provide a report to the California Department of Parks and Recreation on all expenditures and revenues from all of the sales or exchanges of land under the land plan, on the acreages of all lands or easements sold, exchanged, and held, and on any funds from all of the sales or exchanges of land under the land plan that have not been expended. The bill would authorize the county to, among other things, propose a plan to the department for the expenditure of any unexpended proceeds from land sales or exchanges under the land plan, to be approved by the department. The bill would authorize the county to, among other things, apply to the department for an extension of the deadline to submit a land plan if the county satisfies specified criteria. The bill would require the department to review and approve or disapprove the request within 60 days of receipt, among other things. The bill would declare that these requirements are an amendment of the act within the meaning of Section 6 of the act and is consistent with the act.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
28–6
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican12
50% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4910.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-3)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 3, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-6-3)
senate
May 6, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Apr 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 13, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3163.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1124
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1124. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline