SB 112 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Hemodialysis technicians.

Summary
Existing federal law sets forth certain requirements that dialysis facilities must meet in order to be certified under the Medicare Program, including a requirement that patient care dialysis technicians at those facilities complete a specified training program, have a high school diploma or equivalency, be certified under a state or national certification program, and meet all applicable state requirements, as specified. Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various clinical laboratory personnel and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Within that law, the Hemodialysis Technician Training Act prohibits a person from providing services as a hemodialysis technician without being certified by the State Department of Public Health as meeting certain requirements, as specified. This bill would revise those requirements and prohibit a person from providing services as a hemodialysis technician without being certified by the department as having a high school diploma or equivalency or 4 years of specified work experience, successfully completing a training program meeting specified requirements, and passing a standardized test, certified by faculty of the University of California and approved by the department, as specified, or passing an examination offered by a certification program approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as specified. The bill would require technicians certified by the department as of the bill's operative date to meet those requirements by April 15, 2010, as specified. The bill would make other conforming and technical, nonsubstantive changes. By changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would also declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
Apr 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Jan 29, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly Aug 31, 2009

How they voted

36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Sep 4, 2009
D Democratic25
23 Yea 2
92% Yea
R Republican15
13 Yea 2
86% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 4, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-4)
senate
Sep 4, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2218.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 31, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-5)
assembly
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 555.)
upper
Apr 1, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 31, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 339.)
upper
Jan 29, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors