Prescribers: dispensing of samples.
Summary
Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, regulates prescribers, as defined, and the dispensing of drugs. Existing law prohibits a prescriber from dispensing drugs or dangerous devices to patients in his or her office unless certain requirements are met. Existing law also authorizes prescribers to furnish a limited quantity of samples if (1) the samples are dispensed in the manufacturer's package, (2) there is no charge to the patient, and (3) an appropriate record is entered in the patient's chart. A knowing violation of the Pharmacy Law is a crime. This bill would require a prescriber dispensing a drug sample or a starter kit to either (1) provide the patient with a copy of the FDA-approved package insert for the drug sample or starter kit or (2) ensure that the manufacturer's warnings are affixed to the package containing the drug sample or starter kit. Because this bill would impose a new requirement under the Pharmacy Law, the knowing violation of which would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Apr 2010
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Apr 22, 2010
How they voted
25–6
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 39
Apr 22, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
42% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Aug 9, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-6-8)
senate
Apr 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 25, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 2986.)
upper
Feb 17, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Leland Yee
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1106
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1106. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline