SB 1059 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Local educational agencies: districts of residence.

Summary
(1) Existing law provides for residency requirements for school attendance, including the requirement that a pupil placed within the boundaries of that school district in a regularly licensed children's institution, a licensed foster home, or a family home pursuant to a placement under a designated statute, is deemed to comply with residency requirements for that district. This bill would provide that a school district into which a pupil is placed in a regularly licensed children's institution, a licensed foster home, or a family home pursuant to a placement under a designated statute is the district of residence. The bill would further require that this school district of residence would be responsible for providing the pupil with a free appropriate public education, as defined. Because this provision would impose new requirements on school districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires a minor under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court as a consequence of delinquent conduct, in conformity with the interests of public safety and protection, to receive care, treatment, and guidance that is consistent with his or her best interest, that holds the minor accountable for his or her behavior, and that is appropriate for his or her circumstances. Existing law provides for the establishment of public schools in juvenile halls, juvenile homes, day centers, juvenile ranches, juvenile camps, regional youth educational facilities, or Orange County youth correctional centers, as specified, to provide juvenile court school pupils with quality education and training. Existing law requires a county board of education to provide for the administration and operation of juvenile court schools in the county, either by the county superintendent of schools, as specified, or by contract with the respective governing boards of the elementary, high school, or unified school district in which the juvenile court school is located. This bill would require that the county board of education is responsible for providing pupils detained in juvenile halls who are individuals with exceptional needs with a free appropriate public education, as defined. However, if the expanded individualized education program team determines that placement is appropriate, the bill would require the provider of educational services to determine the school district responsible for paying and providing for education placement, pursuant to criteria specified by the bill. Because this provision would impose new requirements on local educational agencies, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 16, 2010 Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2010 · Assembly Aug 16, 2010

How they voted

33–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 38
Jun 1, 2010
D Democratic25
22 Yea 3
88% Yea
R Republican13
11 Yea 2
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
36
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4643.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-8-7)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 3.)
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.)
lower
Jun 1, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-5)
senate
May 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3594.)
upper
May 13, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 4, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 22, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3295.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 16, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
CA
25