SB 1049 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Bail.

Summary
Existing law authorizes a magistrate or commissioner, with respect to a defendant who has been arrested for a bailable felony offense or for the misdemeanor offense of violating a domestic violence order, to set bail higher than that provided in the schedule of bail in an amount that he or she deems sufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance or to ensure the protection of a victim, or family member of a victim, of domestic violence. Existing law also provides that the defendant may make application to the magistrate for release on bail lower than that provided in the schedule of bail or on his or her own recognizance. This bill would prohibit defendants who have been arrested for specified serious, violent, or other felonies from making an application to the magistrate for release on bail lower than that provided in the schedule of bail or on his or her own recognizance. Existing law also provides that before any person who has been arrested for commission of certain specified crimes is released on bail in an amount other than that specified in the schedule of bail for the offense or is released on his or her own recognizance, a hearing shall be held at which the court shall consider certain enumerated factors, including the potential danger the detained person poses to other persons. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding this provision, a judge or magistrate may, with respect to an offense specified in the provision described above concerning bailable felonies and misdemeanor domestic violence order violations, increase bail to an amount exceeding that set forth in the bail schedule without a hearing, provided an oral or written declaration of facts justifying the increase is presented under oath by a sworn peace officer. By expanding the application of the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Aug 2010
Introduced Feb 16, 2010 Signed Aug 23, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 24, 2010 · Assembly Aug 5, 2010

How they voted

273
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 37
May 24, 2010
D Democratic25
16 Yea 3 Nay 6
64% Yea
R Republican12
11 Yea 1
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Aug 23, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 5, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-7)
assembly
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30).
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 24, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-3-7)
senate
May 11, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 20, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 3. Page 3308.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 16, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TH
Tom Harman
RRepublican
CA
35