Government tort claims: California State University.
Summary
Existing law bars a suit for money or damages against a public entity on a cause of action for which a claim is required to be presented, until a written claim therefor has been presented to the public entity and acted upon by the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board, the governing body of a local public entity, or the Judicial Council, as applicable, or has been deemed to have been rejected, except as specified. This bill would require, instead, in the case of a claim against the California State University for money or damages based upon an express contract or for an injury for which the Trustees of the California State University is liable, that the claim be presented to the Trustees of the California State University. The bill would require the trustees to act on the claim in accordance with the procedure that the trustees provide by rule. The bill would specify certain means of presentation and service of a claim against the California State University, and would require the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board to immediately notify a claimant who mistakenly presents a claim against the California State University to the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board, as specified. The bill would authorize the trustees to adjust and pay any claim arising out of the activities of the California State University, and would make other conforming changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 16, 2010
Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 10, 2010 · Assembly Aug 12, 2010
How they voted
27–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 34
May 10, 2010
D
Democratic23
82% Yea
R
Republican11
72% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 12, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-1)
assembly
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 10, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-0-7)
senate
May 4, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3427.)
upper
Apr 21, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3304.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 7, 2010
Upper · Passed
(April 7 amended version corrected April 20.)
upper
Mar 24, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3016.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 16, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DC
Dave Cogdill
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1046
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1046. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline