Powers of attorney: duties.
Summary
The Power of Attorney Law creates various duties and requires an attorney-in-fact to observe the standard of care that would be observed by a prudent person dealing with property of another, or if an attorney-in-fact has special skills he or she shall observe the standard of care that would be observed by others with similar skills. However, existing law provides that an attorney-in-fact is not liable for a loss to the principal's property if he or she is not compensated, unless the loss results from his or her bad faith, intentional wrongdoing, or gross negligence. This bill would delete the latter provision. The bill would provide that if the attorney-in-fact breaches a duty pursuant to the Power of Attorney Law he or she is chargeable with interest for any loss or depreciation in value of the property, any profit made through the breach, or any profit that would have accrued to the principal if the loss or profit is a result of the breach. This bill would allow the court, in its discretion, to excuse the attorney-in-fact if he or she acted reasonably and in good faith, or if the court finds that an attorney-in-fact acted in bad faith, he or she would be held liable for twice the value of the property recovered.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Signed into Law
Jul 2010
Introduced Feb 12, 2010
Signed Jul 6, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 13, 2010 · Assembly Jun 21, 2010
How they voted
28–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 34
May 13, 2010
D
Democratic23
82% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
6
Committee
3
Jul 6, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Jun 21, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-3)
assembly
Jun 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
lower
May 13, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-6)
senate
May 5, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3444.)
upper
Feb 12, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TH
Tom Harman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1038
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1038. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline