AB 983 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Recycling: California redemption value containers.

Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act (act) , requires that every beverage container sold or offered for sale in this state is required to have a minimum refund value. A distributor is required to pay a redemption payment for every beverage container sold or offered for sale in the state to the Department of Conservation and the department is required to deposit those amounts in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. The money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the department to pay refund values, administrative fees to processors, and a reserve for contingencies. A violation of the act is a crime. "Beverage" is defined, for purposes of the act, to include, among other things, beer and other malt beverages, wine and distilled spirit coolers, carbonated mineral and soda waters, noncarbonated fruit drinks, and vegetable juices, in liquid form that are intended for human consumption, but excludes from that definition vegetable drinks in beverage containers of more than 16 ounces. The act also excludes, from the definition of beverage, any product sold in a container that is not an aluminum beverage container, a glass container, a plastic beverage container, or a bimetal container. This bill would, as of April 1, 2010, revise the term beverage to include vegetable, fruit, nut, grain, or soy drinks or juices or noncarbonated drinks that contain any percentage of those drinks or juices, and would delete the requirement that a vegetable, drink, subject to the act, be sold in a container of 16 ounces or less. The bill would delete the exclusion from the term beverage, for a product that is not sold in the above-specified types of containers. The bill would additionally exclude from the definition a beverage in a flexible foil, plastic pouch, or aseptic container delivering 7 or less fluid ounces. Since the additional payments for the plastic beverage containers and other beverage containers that this bill would make subject to the act would be deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would also impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes relating to beverage containers. (2) Existing law requires a distributor of specified beverage containers to pay a redemption payment to the Department of Conservation for each beverage container sold or transferred for deposit in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. The money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the department to pay refund values, administrative fees to processors, and a reserve for contingencies. This bill would raise the amount of the redemption payment paid by the distributor and the refund value, as specified. Since the increased payments for the beverage containers that are subject to the act would be deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law requires that a distributor pay the redemption payment not later than the last day of the 3rd month following the sale and authorizes a distributor, upon the approval of the department, to elect to make a single annual payment if the distributor meets specified conditions and notifies the department of its intent to make annual redemption payments. This bill would require all beverage distributors to make the redemption payment no later than the last day of the 2nd month following the sale of the beverages. This bill would revise the conditions under which a distributor would be authorized to make a single annual payment. (3) Existing law authorizes the Department of Conservation to expend moneys in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for administration of the act. This bill would require the department to expend 10% less for administration of the act than the amount that was appropriated for administration for the 2008–09 fiscal year. (4) The department is authorized to make specified expenditures from the moneys remaining in the fund after the moneys for certain purposes have been set aside. This bill would increase the amount of moneys for grants to certified community conservation corps for beverage container litter reduction programs and recycling programs. The bill would suspend, for the 2009–10 fiscal year, expenditures for grants for beverage container recycling and litter reduction programs and a statewide public education and information campaign aimed at promoting increased recycling of beverage containers. The bill would eliminate funds the department is authorized to expend for grants for specified beverage container recycling and litter reduction programs. The bill would prohibit the department from reducing expenditures for handling fees and conservation corps grants for the 2009–10 and 2010–11 fiscal years. (5) Existing law requires the department to continuously assist dealers and recyclers to establish certified recycling centers within in each convenience zone. This bill would provide assistance and incentives to reduce the number of zones not serviced by a certified recycling center. (6) The bill would delete obsolete provisions and make conforming changes. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Feb 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2009

How they voted

4424
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 70
Jun 2, 2009
D Democratic43
42 Yea 1
97% Yea
I Independent1
1 Nay
100% Nay
R Republican26
2 Yea 23 Nay 1
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
23
Key actions
9
Committee
13
Amendments
1
Feb 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Sep 10, 2009
Committee
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 9, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Jul 16, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (July 15).
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-24-2)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 15).
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors

Sponsors