Water corporations: water meters.
Summary
The existing Water Measurement Law requires every water purveyor, as defined, who sells, leases, rents, furnishes, or delivers water service, as defined, for potable water, to any person, as defined, to require, as a condition of new water service, that a suitable water meter to measure the water service be installed, requires that the cost of installation of the meter be paid by the user of water, and authorizes the water purveyor to impose and collect charges for those costs. These requirements are not applicable to a community water system that serves fewer than 15 service connections used by yearlong residents or regularly serves fewer than 25 yearlong residents, or a single well that services the water supply of a single-family residential home. The Water Measurement Law contains additional requirements relative to the installation of water meters and charges for water relative to urban water suppliers, as defined. The Water Measurement Law authorizes a water purveyor, including an urban water supplier, to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, and operation and maintenance of water meters from rates, fees, or charges. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including water corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. The existing Public Utilities Act prohibits the commission from requiring certain water corporations, or a residential customer of those corporations, to install a water meter, except after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation at which hearing all of the following findings are made: (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the water corporation, (2) metering will result in a significant reduction in water consumption within the corporation's service area, and (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the corporation's service territory, unless the commission finds metering is necessary to assure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service territory. This bill would repeal the existing limitation in the Public Utilities Act that limits the authority of the commission to require a water corporation to install water meters. The bill would require a water corporation with 500 or more service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law to install a water meter on each new service connection and, by not later than January 1, 2025, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection, as provided. The bill would require a water corporation with less than 500 service connections as of January 1, 2010, that thereafter reaches 500 or more service connections and that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection within 10 years after it reaches 500 or more service connections. The bill would require each water corporation that has installed water meters, or caused water meters to be installed, that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, on and after January 1, 2015, to charge customers for potable water based on the actual volume of deliveries, as measured by the water meter, but would authorize the water corporation to delay imposition of volume-based water service charges for one annual billing cycle in order to provide customers with experience with those charges. The bill would require a water corporation to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, operation, and maintenance of water meters in rates, fees, or charges, subject to existing law relative to approval of rates by the commission, and would require the commission to ensure that a water corporation complies with these requirements or the requirements of the Water Measurement Law. This bill would authorize the commission to require a water corporation that furnishes potable water for residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional use through less than 500 service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of Water Measurement Law, or a residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional customer of such corporation, to install a water meter at any water service connection between the water system of the corporation and the customer if after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation, and upon the commission finding, based upon the evidence presented at that hearing, that (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the corporation, (2) metering will result in a reduction in water consumption within the service area of the water corporation, or (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the service area of the corporation unless it is found to be necessary to ensure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service area of the corporation. This bill would make a clarifying change to a provision of the Water Measurement Law. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 1, 2009 · Assembly May 28, 2009
How they voted
23–15
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Sep 1, 2009
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
7
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 57. Noes 17. Page 3082.)
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-15-2)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 15, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (July 7).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 25, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (50-22-2)
assembly
May 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 13).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 975
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 975. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline