Relative caregivers and foster parents.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes a social worker to take a child who is at risk of abuse or neglect into temporary custody under specified circumstances. Existing law requires the social worker to investigate the circumstances of the child and the facts surrounding the taking of the child into custody. Existing law requires that the social worker immediately release the child to the custody of the child's parent or guardian, or other responsible relative, except under certain conditions. If the child is not released to the custody of his or her parent or guardian, the child is deemed to be detained, and a detention hearing must be conducted before the expiration of the next judicial day after a petition to declare the minor a dependent child of the juvenile court has been filed. This bill would require a social worker, when a child is removed from the home, to conduct, within 30 days, an investigation, as specified, in order to identify and locate all grandparents, adult siblings, and other adult relatives of the child, in order to provide, except when that relative's history of family or domestic violence makes notification inappropriate, those persons with specified information, including that the child has been removed from the custody of his or her parents or guardians and an explanation of various options to participate in the care and placement of the child, as specified, and to report to the court at the initial petition hearing regarding that effort. The bill would require the State Department of Social Services to develop the written notice providing that information to relatives. The bill would also require the Judicial Council to develop a relative information form, as specified. The form would provide information regarding the needs of the child, and would include a provision whereby the relative may request the permission of the court to address the court. The bill would require a social worker to provide that form, on and after January 1, 2011, to the adult relatives identified pursuant to the provision described above. By imposing new duties on social workers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law authorizes a peace officer to take a minor into temporary custody without a warrant and to deliver that minor to a probation officer under specified circumstances. This bill would enact provisions similar to those described in paragraph (1) that would be applicable to minors who are taken into temporary custody and delivered to a probation officer. The bill would impose new duties on probation officers, similar to those imposed upon social workers, as described above in paragraph (1) , with respect to conducting an investigation to locate adult relatives and providing those relatives with specified information. These provisions would not, however, require probation officers to develop the relative information form or provide it to those relatives. By imposing new duties upon probation officers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly Jun 2, 2009
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 36
Sep 10, 2009
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
10
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3370.)
lower
Sep 11, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-4)
senate
Sep 3, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 19, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Jun 24, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-2)
assembly
Jun 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 20, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 27, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUM. S.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 938
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 938. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline