AB 933 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Workers' compensation: medical treatment.

Summary
Existing workers' compensation law generally requires employers to secure the payment of workers' compensation, including medical treatment, for injuries incurred by their employees that arise out of, and in the course of, employment. Existing law, for purposes of workers' compensation, defines "psychologist" to mean a licensed psychologist with a doctoral degree in psychology, or a doctoral degree deemed equivalent for licensure by the Board of Psychology, as specified, and who either has at least 2 years of clinical experience in a recognized health setting or has met the standards of the National Register of the Health Service Providers in Psychology. This bill would require the psychologist to be licensed by California state law. Existing law requires every employer to establish a medical treatment utilization review process, in compliance with specified requirements, either directly or through its insurer or an entity with which the employer or insurer contracts for these services. Existing law provides that no person other than a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the medical treatment services, and where these services are within the scope of the physician's practice, requested by the physician may modify, delay, or deny requests for authorization of medical treatment for reasons of medical necessity to cure and relieve. This bill would require the physician to be licensed by California state law.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 26, 2009 Vetoed Sep 23, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2010 · Assembly May 21, 2009

How they voted

2211
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 38
Aug 23, 2010
D Democratic25
21 Yea 4
84% Yea
R Republican13
1 Yea 11 Nay 1
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
6
Sep 23, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 6603.)
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-11-5)
senate
Aug 23, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (August 12).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 24, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 14, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 15, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 21, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-28-1)
assembly
May 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (May 6).
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.