Conflict of interest: remote interest in a contract.
Summary
Existing law prohibits Members of the Legislature, and state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees from being financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity, or by any body or board of which they are members. Existing law defines what is a remote interest in a contract that does not present a prohibited conflict of interest under these provisions. This bill would revise the definition of "remote interest" to include the interest of a person who is both a member of a state, county, district, judicial district, or city body or board, and an officer or employee of an investor-owned utility in a contract related to energy efficiency encouragement programs, under specified conditions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
May 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2009 · Assembly Aug 20, 2009
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 39
Aug 17, 2009
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
9
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-2)
assembly
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2658.)
lower
Aug 17, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-5)
senate
Aug 17, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and to third reading.
upper
Jun 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17).
upper
Jun 8, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 21, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 11, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 7, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (May 5).
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 906
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 906. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline