Property taxation: City of Bell: refunds for overpayment.
Summary
Existing property tax law establishes various procedures and requirements with respect to the annual allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues derived from the ad valorem taxation of locally assessed property. These procedures include a reduction in the allocation of ad valorem property taxes to a jurisdiction that imposes a rate in excess of the maximum rate authorized by law in amounts equal to the amount collected pursuant to the excess rate, and requires any amount subtracted from a jurisdiction's allocation to be allocated to elementary, high school, and unified school districts, as provided. This bill would instead require, with respect to the ad valorem property taxes collected in excess of the maximum rate authorized by law in the 2007–08, 2008–09, and 2009–10 fiscal years for the City of Bell, that the City of Bell pay the County of Los Angeles an amount equal to the amount of ad valorem property taxes collected in excess of the maximum rate, and would require the County of Los Angeles to make refunds to taxpayers, as provided. This bill would require those amounts remaining after making refunds to taxpayers, as specified, to be allocated to elementary, high school, and unified school districts, as provided. This bill would require the City of Bell to reimburse the county auditor for the actual and reasonable costs incurred by the county in administering these refunds and allocations, including specified administrative overhead costs. This bill would also make findings and declarations regarding the necessity of a special statute. By imposing additional duties upon county officials in issuing refunds or reducing the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Sep 13, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2010 · Assembly Jun 2, 2009
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
45
Key actions
12
Committee
16
Amendments
9
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 6941.)
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 31).
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 30, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Return to Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.)
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Committee
From committee: That pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10, the measure be re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 27, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Aug 27, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Aug 20, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Sep 11, 2009
Committee
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 9, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 30, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-1)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 6, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 900
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 900. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline