Common interest developments: disclosures.
Summary
The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act provides for the creation and regulation of common interest developments. Under existing law, a common interest development is managed by an association pursuant to the provisions of the governing documents of the development. Existing law requires an association to provide specified disclosure documents to its members. Existing law allows the required disclosure documents to be delivered electronically. This bill would provide that a document that uses an electronic record to provide or make available the document satisfies the writing requirement, as provided. This bill would also require an association to distribute annually to its members a Disclosure Documents Index, as specified. Existing law requires an association to distribute to its members a pro forma operating budget for each fiscal year, as specified. Existing law also requires an association to distribute, with the pro forma operating budget, an Assessment and Reserve Funding Disclosure Summary containing specified information regarding the association's assessments and reserves. This bill would require that Assessment and Reserve Funding Disclosure Summary to include a specified statement regarding the interest rate earned on reserve funds and the assumed inflation rate applied to major component repair and replacement costs.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2009 · Assembly May 28, 2009
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 36
Aug 24, 2009
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
6
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2754.)
lower
Aug 25, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 24, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-1)
senate
Jun 26, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and to third reading.
upper
Jun 25, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-1)
assembly
May 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (May 13).
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 899
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 899. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline