Vote by mail ballots.
Summary
Existing law sets forth procedures for voting by mail and requires the local elections official to compare the signature on a vote by mail ballot received with the voter's signature that appears on the affidavit of registration. Existing law requires the elections official to establish procedures to track and confirm the receipt of vote by mail ballots that are voted and to make that information available by means of online access using the county's elections division Internet Web site, or, if it has no Internet Web site, then by toll-free telephone number that may be used to confirm the date the ballot was received. This bill would further require the local elections official to establish a free access system by which a vote by mail voter may find out whether his or her ballot was counted and, if not, the reason why it was not counted, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Apr 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Dec 23, 2008
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2009 · Assembly Apr 30, 2009
How they voted
25–13
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Aug 24, 2009
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2752.)
lower
Aug 25, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 24, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-13-1)
senate
Jun 30, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 16, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 16).
upper
May 14, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.
upper
Apr 30, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-8)
assembly
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 31).
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Dec 24, 2008
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 23.
lower
Dec 23, 2008
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Co
AA
Anthony Adams
RRepublican
Co
DL
Diane L Harkey
RRepublican
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Co
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 84
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 84. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline