Task force for education technology.
Summary
Existing law establishes various programs to enhance education technology, including the California Technology Assistance Project, which is composed of regional consortia that work collaboratively with school districts and county offices of education to meet locally defined educational needs that can be effectively addressed with the use of technology, as specified. This bill would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to establish a task force for education technology, funded by private donations, for the purpose of making preliminary recommendations on technology literacy model standards for grades 7 to 12, inclusive, in California public schools. The bill would require the task force to consist of no more than 15 education technology experts, including, but not necessarily limited to, parents, current credentialed teachers, administrators, school board members, researchers, and industry representatives. This bill would require the task force to make preliminary recommendations to the Superintendent on technology literacy model standards for grades 7 to 12, inclusive, within one year after the date the task force is convened, require the Superintendent to recommend technology literacy model standards to the state board within 2 months after receiving the recommendations for the model standards from the task force, and require the state board to adopt technology literacy model content standards, pursuant to the recommendations of the Superintendent, within 2 months after receiving the recommendations for the model standards from the Superintendent. The bill also would require the recommendations to be made by the task force to the state board and the Legislature within 18 months after the task force is convened. The bill would require the task force to address specified issues and, to the extent feasible, to consider previously developed state technology plans, as specified.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2009 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
22–11
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 36
Sep 9, 2009
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
12
Committee
12
Amendments
8
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 51. Noes 26. Page 3295.)
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-11-3)
senate
Aug 31, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 20, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 15).
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-22-3)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 13, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TT
Tom Torlakson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 836
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 836. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline