AB 827 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Local public employees.

Summary
The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act contains various provisions that govern collective bargaining of local represented employees. The Ralph M. Brown Act requires that all meetings of a legislative body of a local agency be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend unless a closed session is authorized. Existing law requires all contracts of employment between an employee and a local agency employer to include a provision which provides that regardless of the term of the contract, if the contract is terminated, the maximum cash settlement that an employee may receive shall be an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by the number of months left on the unexpired term of the contract, with a maximum of 18 months. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2011, additionally prohibit an employment contract for a local excluded employee, as defined, from including any clause that provides for an automatic renewal, an automatic compensation increase, as specified, or an automatic compensation increase in excess of a cost-of-living adjustment. The bill would also require the local agency, as defined, to complete a performance review of any excluded employee, as defined, before an increase in compensation in excess of a cost-of-living adjustment may be implemented for that individual. The bill would also specify that those records, procedures, and actions shall conform to the requirements of law, including, but not limited to, the Public Records Act and the Ralph M. Brown Act. By expanding the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would express a legislative finding and declaration that, to ensure the statewide integrity of local government, the procedures for the appointment and compensation of excluded employees are an issue of statewide concern and that, therefore, all counties and cities, including charter counties, charter cities, and charter cities and counties, would be subject to the provisions of the bill. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 26, 2009 Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2010 · Assembly May 28, 2009

How they voted

330
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2010
D Democratic23
21 Yea 2
91% Yea
R Republican12
12 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
42
Key actions
10
Committee
13
Amendments
7
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 69. Noes 3. Page 6940.)
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 31).
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Return to Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.)
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Committee
From committee: That pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10, the measure be re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 27, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Aug 27, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10 (c).
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and to third reading.
upper
Jul 6, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 1).
upper
Jun 24, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-27)
assembly
May 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 13).
lower
May 7, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 6, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors

Sponsors