Restitution centers.
Summary
Existing law establishes restitution centers for inmates to provide a means for those sentenced to prison to be able to pay their victims' financial restitution, as specified. This bill would revise what is included by the term "restitution" for these purposes, and provide that inmates who commit crimes involving direct victims shall receive priority placement in restitution centers, as specified. The bill would require the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, no later than June 30, 2011, to reopen and operate 2 restitution centers. The bill would provide that this requirement shall not become operative if certain reforms are implemented, as specified. Existing law provides that a court may order the department to place an eligible defendant in a restitution center if the court makes a restitution order or if a restitution agreement is entered into by the victims and the defendant. The bill would specify that the court may order the department to place an eligible defendant in a restitution center if the court makes an order for a restitution fine. Existing law provides criteria for eligibility for placement in a restitution center, including in part, that a defendant is eligible for placement in a restitution center if he or she has not served a prison term within the 5 years prior to the present conviction, does not have a criminal history of a conviction for the sale of drugs or for a crime involving violence or sex, and did not receive a sentence of more than 36 months. This bill would revise those criteria to provide, among other criteria, that a defendant is eligible for placement in a restitution center if he or she does not have a criminal history of a conviction for the sale of drugs within the previous 5 years, or for an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, or for a serious or violent felony, and the defendant did not receive a sentence of more than 60 months for the current offense or offenses. The bill would also state findings and declarations of the Legislature pertaining to restitution centers and inmates.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly Jun 2, 2009
How they voted
27–7
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 39
Sep 3, 2009
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican14
50% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
7
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 1. Page 3184.)
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-7-5)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (August 17).
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 20, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 9, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-1-3)
assembly
Jun 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Mar 23, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FF
Felipe Fuentes
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 807
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 807. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline