AB 743 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Foster care: sibling placement.

Summary
Existing law provides for the placement of dependent children by the juvenile court according to specified procedures. Existing law declares the policy of the Legislature relating to foster care, including that foster care should be a temporary method of care for children and that reunification with the natural parent or parents or another alternate permanent living situation such as adoption or guardianship is more suitable to a child's well-being than is foster care. Existing law requires any order placing a dependent child in foster care, and ordering reunification services, to provide for visitation between the child and any sibling, unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that sibling interaction is detrimental to either child. This bill would, instead, require the order to provide for visitation unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the interaction is contrary to the safety or well-being of either child. Existing law requires the responsible local agency to make diligent efforts in all out-of-home placements of dependent children to develop and maintain sibling relationships. If siblings are not placed together, the social worker is required to explain why those efforts are not appropriate. This bill would, instead, require the social worker, if siblings are not placed together, to explain why those efforts would be contrary to the safety or well-being of any of the siblings. The bill also would require the social worker to make diligent efforts to place siblings together in the same placement. Existing law requires, as soon as possible after a placing agency makes a decision with respect to a placement or a change in placement of a dependent child, the placing agency to notify the child's attorney and provide specified information. This bill would recast and revise the above requirements relating to the placement of siblings, including requiring the placing agency to make a specified notification to the child's attorney and the child's sibling's attorney when a planned change of placement will result in the separation of siblings currently placed together. By increasing the duties of social workers and county placing agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jan 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 26, 2009 Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2010 · Assembly Jan 27, 2010

How they voted

320
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 37
Aug 18, 2010
D Democratic25
21 Yea 4
84% Yea
R Republican12
11 Yea 1
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
37
Key actions
13
Committee
15
Amendments
8
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6376.)
lower
Aug 18, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-5)
senate
Aug 18, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 12).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
Jun 1, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 17, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Feb 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
upper
Jan 27, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-0-9)
assembly
Jan 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Jan 25, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (January 21).
lower
Jan 21, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, second hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jan 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 11, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
May 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. by unanimous consent, and then be re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and JUD.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.