Public postsecondary education: genetic testing.
Summary
(1) Existing law, known as the Donahoe Higher Education Act, sets forth the missions of the various segments of public postsecondary education in this state. The segments of public postsecondary education in this state are the California State University, the University of California, and the California Community Colleges. The provisions of the Donahoe Higher Education Act apply to the University of California only to the extent that the Regents of the University of California act by resolution to make them applicable. Existing law, known as the Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation Act, prohibits a person from being subjected to any medical experiment unless the informed consent of that person is obtained. The act specifies the potential civil and criminal liability of a person who is primarily responsible for conduct of a medical experiment and who negligently allows the experiment to be conducted without a subject's informed consent or who willfully fails to obtain informed consent. This bill would add to the Donahoe Higher Education Act a provision requesting the California State University and the University of California to refrain from making an unsolicited request, as defined, to an enrolled or prospective student of that segment for a DNA sample for the purpose of genetic testing. The bill would specify that it does not prohibit a licensed health care provider in a university facility from performing genetic testing and counseling in the course of a patient's medical care. The bill would require the University of California and the California State University to report, on a quarterly basis, in writing, the total amount of any expenditures, irrespective of source, the university makes pursuant to legal judgments or settlements resulting from violations of the informed consent requirements of the Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation Act or a specified federal regulation, or both, relating to unsolicited requests for DNA samples. The bill would require that the first of these quarterly reports be submitted to the Controller, the Governor, and the Legislature on or before January 1, 2011, and include all university expenditures for this purpose that have occurred prior to the date of the report. The bill would require the Controller to revert to the General Fund an amount equal to the amount of any expenditures reported pursuant to the bill from any unencumbered moneys that have been previously appropriated from the General Fund to the University of California and the California State University. The bill would require that subsequent quarterly reports be submitted on or before January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year while this provision is operative. These provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2015. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 12, 2008
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 13, 2009
How they voted
61–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 62
Apr 13, 2009
D
Democratic38
100% Yea
R
Republican24
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 24, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 30, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-1)
assembly
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 1).
lower
Mar 19, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 18).
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Dec 15, 2008
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 14.
lower
Dec 12, 2008
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CN
Chris Norby
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 70
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 70. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline