Utility property.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities and can establish its own procedures, subject to statutory limitations or directions and constitutional requirements of due process. The existing Public Utilities Act prohibits, with certain exemptions, any public utility other than a common carrier by railroad, from selling, leasing, assigning, mortgaging, or otherwise disposing of or encumbering the whole or any part of specified property necessary or useful in the performance of the public utility's duties to the public, without first having either secured an order from the commission authorizing it to do so for qualified transactions valued above $5,000,000, or for qualified transactions valued at $5,000,000 or less, having filed an advice letter and obtained a resolution from the commission authorizing it to do so. Existing law requires the commission to determine the types of transactions valued at $5,000,000 or less that qualify for advice letter handling. Existing law states the intent of the Legislature that transactions with monetary values that materially impact a public utility's rate base, or transactions that would trigger the commission's review responsibilities under the California Environmental Quality Act, should not qualify for expedited advice letter review. This bill would delete the requirement, for qualified transactions valued at $5,000,000 or less, that the commission approve the advice letter by resolution. The bill would authorize the executive director of the commission or the director of the division of the commission having regulatory jurisdiction over the utility to approve the advice letter for qualified transactions valued at $5,000,000 or less for which an advice letter is filed that is uncontested. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature that transactions with monetary values that materially impact a public utility's rate base, or transactions that would trigger the commission's review responsibilities as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, should not qualify for expedited advice letter review. The bill would authorize the filing of an advice letter for transactions by the public utility if the lead agency has completed the appropriate review under the California Environmental Quality Act for the transaction, and the commission is the responsible agency under the act and approves the advice letter by resolution voted upon by the commission.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2009 · Assembly May 14, 2009
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 36
Aug 24, 2009
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
12
Committee
13
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-1)
senate
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 7).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 10, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 21, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 14, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-5)
assembly
May 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 6).
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 698
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 698. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline