California Environmental Quality Act: arbitration.
Summary
"?>The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also generally requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA provides some exemptions from its requirements. This bill would allow an applicant for a project and the lead agency, at the time of application, to opt to resolve all disputes arising out of a subsequent environmental impact report for that project before an arbitrator, in lieu of retaining the option to file an action or proceeding arising out of those disputes before a court. If an applicant and the lead agency opt to do so, the bill would require the applicant and the lead agency to agree to an arbitrator.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Last action Feb 2, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Apr 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Co
BB
Bill Berryhill
RRepublican
Co
CD
Chuck DeVore
RRepublican
Co
KD
Kevin D Jeffries
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 696
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 696. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline