Subdivision maps.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Subdivision Map Act, requires the legislative body of a city or county to deny approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, unless it makes certain findings. This bill would require the legislative body of a county to make 3 specified findings before approving a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, for an area located in a state responsibility area or a very high fire hazard severity zone, as defined. The bill would provide that this provision does not supersede the requirements of local ordinances and specified regulations that provide equivalent or more stringent minimum requirements. (2) Existing law requires the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to adopt regulations implementing minimum fire safety standards related to defensible space which are applicable to state responsibility area lands under the authority of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, and provides that these regulations apply to the perimeters and access to all residential, commercial, and industrial building construction within state responsibility areas approved after January 1, 1991. This bill would require the board, prior to January 1, 2011, to initiate a rulemaking process to consider adopting regulations requiring a minimum of 2 separate access roads for a subdivision in a state responsibility area or very high fire hazard severity zone.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly Jun 3, 2009
How they voted
24–12
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Sep 4, 2009
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
78% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
6
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 59. Noes 18. Page 3201.)
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 4, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-12-3)
senate
Sep 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 31, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 8).
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 3, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-17-4)
assembly
May 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) (May 13).
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 22).
lower
Mar 23, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 666
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 666. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline