AB 665 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

State adoption services: investment.

Summary
Existing law provides for child welfare services, which are public social services directed toward, among other purposes, protecting and promoting the welfare of all children, including those in foster care placement. Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services may provide state adoption services in a county that has not established a county adoption agency. Existing law requires the state to reinvest incentive payments, received through the implementation of specified provisions of federal law, into the child welfare system, in order to provide adoption services for older children. This bill would, instead, require the state to reinvest adoption incentive payments, received through the implementation of specified provisions of federal law, into the child welfare system, in order to provide legal permanency outcomes for older children, as specified. This bill would require the adoption incentive payments, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be allocated to counties, and the department for a county in which the department serves as an adoption agency, based on documented legal permanency outcomes for older children achieved by each county for the purpose of improving legal permanency outcomes for older children, as specified.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 1, 2009 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009

How they voted

35–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
Sep 1, 2009
D Democratic25
21 Yea 4
84% Yea
R Republican14
14 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
33
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
5
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 3, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2983.)
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-4)
senate
Jul 6, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 24, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 20, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 14, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AT
Alberto Torrico
DDemocratic
CA
20