Special education: behavioral intervention plans: mandate claim: funding.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, on or before September 1, 1992, to develop, and the State Board of Education to adopt, regulations, as specified, governing the use of behavioral interventions for individuals with exceptional needs receiving special education and related services. Existing law prescribes the calculations to be made to determine the amount of General Fund moneys to allocate to each special education local plan area. This bill would require the Superintendent to perform various calculations to increase the amount of funding per unit of average daily attendance for each special education local plan area, as specified. The bill would appropriate $65,000,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent in augmentation of a specified item of the Budget Act of 2009 for purposes of providing that increased funding. The bill also would appropriate $10,000,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent for allocation on a one-time basis to county offices of education and special education local plan areas, as specified. The bill would direct that $85,000,000 be appropriated from the General Fund on a one-time basis in each of the 2011–12 to 2016–17 fiscal years, inclusive, except as provided, to the Superintendent for allocation to school districts on a per-pupil basis. The Superintendent would be required to use specified calculations to compute the allocation for each school district. The bill would deem the funding described in this paragraph as payments in full satisfaction of, and in lieu of, any reimbursable mandate claims resulting from the statement of decision of the Commission on State Mandates regarding the Behavioral Intervention Plans Mandated Cost Test Claim. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Last action Feb 2, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
5
May 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 15).
lower
Mar 23, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TT
Tom Torlakson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 661
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 661. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline