Sprinkler fitters: licensing.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Office of the State Fire Marshal for specified purposes and requires the Governor to appoint the State Fire Marshal. Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal to adopt and administer regulations and building standards he or she deems necessary in order to, among other things, establish and control a program for servicing, testing, and maintaining all automatic fire extinguishing systems, including fire sprinkler systems. The Contractors' State License Law provides for the licensing and regulation of contractors by the Contractors' State License Board. Under that law, the registrar may refuse to issue, reinstate, reactivate, or renew a license or may suspend a license for the failure of a licensee to resolve all outstanding final liabilities, which include taxes, additions to tax, penalties, interest, and any fees that may be assessed by the board or other specified state agencies. This bill would include the assessments of the State Fire Marshal among the liabilities for which a license may be affected for nonpayment. This bill would enact a comprehensive program for the certification and regulation of sprinkler fitters, as defined, by the State Fire Marshal. The bill would prohibit a person from performing work on any fire suppression system, as defined, unless he or she possesses a valid sprinkler fitter or limited scope sprinkler fitter certificate issued by the State Fire Marshal, and would prohibit a person or entity from employing a person to perform work on a fire suppression system without such a certificate. The bill would provide for the issuance of, and would set forth eligibility standards for, various certificates and permits, and would require the State Fire Marshal to adopt a schedule of fees in amounts necessary to cover the cost of administering and enforcing these provisions. This bill would provide for the enforcement of these provisions by the State Fire Marshal, and would require the State Fire Marshal to revoke or suspend a certificate or permit, or reprimand a certificate holder or permitholder, for specified reasons. The bill would also provide that a person licensed under the Contractors' State License Law who violates these provisions would be subject to disciplinary action by the Contractors' State License Board. A knowing and willful violation of these licensing and regulatory provisions would be a misdemeanor. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
36–25
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 62
Jun 1, 2009
D
Democratic38
94% Yea
R
Republican24
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
5
Aug 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, second hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 24, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Committee
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 26, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 25, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-25-1)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 13, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (April 22).
lower
Mar 23, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and B. & P.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AT
Alberto Torrico
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 660
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 660. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline